|
Post by Stevethemovieman on Jun 13, 2009 22:50:09 GMT -5
Any movies that shouldn't be on blu-ray?
|
|
|
Post by No Personality on Jun 13, 2009 23:45:00 GMT -5
Any and every single movie made after 2002. There should be a manditory rule for studios to start with older films to do on Blu-Ray first - so they'll actually look good when it's time for stuff like most of Anchor Bay, Image / Something Weird, Troma, Tokyo Shock / Media Blasters, and Elite / Synapse's movies, instead of these movies being ignored and forgotten and instead they just do 15 versions of every piece of crap new millennium-made movie that nobody gives a crap about.
As for older films, it might be too late for some of these but - I don't want to see Armageddon, Men in Black, Coyote Ugly, and many many many other films come to Blu-Ray. Ever.
|
|
|
Post by thenuke1 on Jun 14, 2009 1:02:04 GMT -5
Crash has a shitty PQ
and the Manchurian Canidate holy shit ... im surprised i got thru the movie cuz its got a horrible transfer ....
|
|
|
Post by wislingsailsmen on Mar 15, 2012 7:41:52 GMT -5
9 to 5 lol saw that and was like really dolly parton should never be on bluray
|
|
|
Post by brendonb27 on Mar 16, 2012 0:34:02 GMT -5
The Secrets of Nimh All Dogs go to Heaven Chawz Passion Play The Crow
|
|
|
Post by spottedfeather on Mar 17, 2012 2:43:53 GMT -5
What's wrong with NIMH ?
|
|
|
Post by donthemovieman on Mar 17, 2012 8:57:03 GMT -5
Anything shoot on vhs
|
|
Joshua
New Member
BTCF
Posts: 13
|
Post by Joshua on Mar 17, 2012 15:35:30 GMT -5
I bought the Devil's Rejects on BluRay for like $10, and though it looks fine it's totally grainy. I know that's the style they went for, but it just makes no sense to pick up on BluRay then if it's not going to look better. Another one would probably be any of the Parnormal Activity movies.
|
|
|
Post by spottedfeather on Mar 17, 2012 16:48:09 GMT -5
That's what Devil's Rejects was going for. The point of blu-ray is to have the movie be as close to the theater experience as possible, having the film look as good as it can. If the movie is supposed to look a certain way, that's how it will presented on blu-ray. You don't want the movie to look better, you're wanting it to look different.
|
|
|
Post by donthemovieman on Mar 18, 2012 5:49:18 GMT -5
Well the paranormal activity films were shoot on full hd cameras so they look good on blu-ray. Really the truth is if you can get a blu-ray of an other films cheap their is no reason to invest in a dvd version. Also Devils rejects was shoot on film and supposed to look like a 70s film and it carrys that look over onto the bluray.
|
|
Joshua
New Member
BTCF
Posts: 13
|
Post by Joshua on Mar 19, 2012 7:44:56 GMT -5
Another one that doesn't look too hot on bluray is the original Dawn of the Dead.. Again, maybe a bad example since it's really old haha
|
|
|
Post by donthemovieman on Mar 20, 2012 20:19:48 GMT -5
It looks okay but i think they didnt do an amazing job on the transfer it has a real smeared look to it which i think is their since they tried to remove alot of film grain. I dont think how old something is means it wont look good on blu-ray. An example is something like the first seasons of star trek from the 60s its looks amazing on blu-ray
|
|
starwarslady
Full Member
In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti
Posts: 106
|
Post by starwarslady on Mar 21, 2012 10:31:36 GMT -5
I thought the original Halloween looked amazing on Blu-Ray, but Ghostbusters was grainy not the best picture.
|
|
|
Post by The Philly Movie Guy! on Mar 21, 2012 13:43:39 GMT -5
Master of the Universe (Dolph Lunderan) Red Sonja Wizards Super Mario Bros. Halloween III: Season of the Witch
|
|